by Adam Sotak When Rachel Radford made the trip to Raleigh this morning,… Read more »
Posts By: Fawn Pattison
by Fawn Pattison Looking back at 2019, here are some of our top… Read more »
By Ileana Rodriguez This Thanksgiving as we count our blessings, we are counting… Read more »
By Fawn Pattison This week we’re bringing you an interview with one… Read more »
by Vikki Crouse More than 230,000 babies and young children attend licensed child… Read more »
by Ciara Zachary Last year we hoped it was one-year blip. Unfortunately, the… Read more »
Parents of kids with special needs stand together By Fawn Pattison Lea este… Read more »
Last week, NC Child and thirty-eight partner organizations from Asheville to Ahoskie sent a letter to North Carolina’s Congressional delegation opposing the new so-called “public charge” rule. This is one of a spate of recent federal anti-immigrant regulations aimed at scaring people away from using services they pay for and are legally entitled to.
All 115 local school districts now prohibit the use of “corporal punishment” because it doesn’t work. So why does North Carolina law still allow it?
This SNAP proposal would take food assistance away from 106,000 North Carolinians, nearly 38,000 of them children.