|
To continue to provide states with appropriate federal standards and supports for improving juvenile justice and delinquency prevention practices, Congress should pass SB 678 to reauthorize the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act.
Overview
On June 18, 2008, Senators Leahy, Specter and Kohl introduced S. 3155, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2008. S. 3155 passed the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on July 31 but did not pass the full Congress before the end of the legislative session.
SB 678, which is similar to last year's bill, has been introduced this session. The bill would reauthorize and improve the Act, which was last reauthorized in 2002.
Did you know? On any given day, more than 7,000 children are in adult jails.
Summary of Improvements in SB 678:
Core Protections
Strengthening the Disproportionate Minority Contact (DMC)
core protection: Research has
documented that youth of color are disproportionately over-represented and
subject to more punitive sanctions than similarly-charged/situated white youth
at all levels of the juvenile justice system. S. 678 gives guidance to States
on complying with the DMC core protection by listing specific steps toward
reducing DMC, including identifying and analyzing key decision points to
determine where disparities exist, collecting data, developing a work plan, and
publicly reporting such efforts.
Strengthening the Jail Removal and Sight and Sound core
protection: Research shows youth
confined in adult jails and lock-ups are more likely to re-offend upon release
and while confined are at pronounced high risk of suffering assault and
committing suicide. S. 678 extends the
jail removal and sight and sound core requirements to keep youth awaiting trial
in criminal court out of adult lock-ups and to ensure sight and sound
separation in the limited circumstances where they are held in adult
facilities. While our recommendation is
to remove all youth under age 18 from adult facilities and ensure sight and
sound separation, S. 678 takes a good step in this direction.
Allows States to continue to serve youth tried in adult
court in juvenile facilities without jeopardizing federal funding: S. 678 would permit States to continue to house
and rehabilitate youth convicted in adult court in juvenile facilities until
they reach a State’s extended juvenile jurisdiction age. Previous interpretation and application of
the law penalized States for utilizing these more appropriate and humane placements
for youth.
Strengthening the deinstitutionalization of status
offenders (DSO) core protection: Under
current law, non-delinquent status offenders, such as children who are truant,
runaway or violate curfew, alcohol and tobacco laws, may be held in juvenile
lock-ups under the Valid Court Order (VCO) exception, which allows judges to
issue detention orders. The practice
persists despite evidence that securely detaining status offenders is harmful
to pro-social development and is costly, especially when compared to more
effective responses including shelter care, crisis counseling, family support,
and/or community and school based interventions. S. 678 requires States that
still permit the use of the exception to phase-out use of the VCO within three
years, and allows States in need to apply for one-year hardship extensions
through the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP).
Until VCO elimination, S. 678 provides extra safeguards for status offenders in
locked facilities, including limits on how long status offenders may be
detained. We would like to see the status offender provisions become stronger
in terms of limiting length of stay in detention, ensuring that the status
offenders are not subject to repeat detention orders and that hardship
exception to the phase-out period are limited.
Overall juvenile
justice system improvements
Improves conditions of confinement in juvenile
facilities: S. 678 calls for the
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Administrator to
report annually on State data regarding the uses of isolation and restraints in
juvenile detention and corrections facilities, and encourages training of
facility staff to eliminate dangerous practices. S. 678 also calls for States
to develop policies and procedures to eliminate the use of dangerous practices
and unreasonable use of restraints and isolation, through the use of
alternative behavior management techniques.
Provides comprehensive services and supports for youth: S. 678 promotes alternatives to detention,
improves screening, diversion, assessment, and treatment for mental health and
substance abuse needs, enhances child welfare and juvenile justice system
integration, supports effective assistance of juvenile counsel, and improves
case management and transitional services for youth upon re-entry. We would
like to see further emphasis placed on provision of services to girls.
Support for states
Increases States’ ability to comply with the core
requirements: S. 678 offers
additional technical assistance to States and authorizes Improvement Grants to
infuse funds and technical assistance to States seeks to regain compliance with
one or more of the core requirements.
Creates incentive grants: S. 678 creates a new incentive grant program
for States that wish to employ empirically-sound prevention and intervention
approaches and improve their work in the areas of workforce development, and
diversion for youth with mental health and substance abuse needs. We would like
to see even greater emphasis on use of evidence-based or promising approaches.
Restores and strengthens the role of OJJDP: S. 678 provides guidance about specific research,
technical assistance, and training efforts to be conducted in a manner that
benefits States and communities, nationwide. The bill also includes important
provisions to improve program and financial oversight and accountability at
OJJDP, and restores the statutory authority given to a national association of
State Advisory Groups.
Funding levels
Sets more appropriate authorization levels for Title II
and Title V: S. 678 provides States with
the resources needed to achieve and sustain compliance with the core
requirements of the JJDPA and take meaningful steps to improve juvenile justice
systems and prevent delinquency and violence. We are very pleased to see that
the Senate has cited authorization levels in the legislation.
Preserves and guards
the community-connected prevention, youth development and rehabilitation focus
Keeps the focus on
prevention and intervention: S. 678
does not introduce unnecessary and punitive approaches to delinquency
prevention and intervention. As the bill
moves through the Judiciary Committee and to the floor of the Senate, we trust
that the Senate will do everything within their power to preserve the
prevention focus of the JJDPA by guarding against any amendments that would
link the JJDPA to provisions and/or other forms of federal legislation that
introduce new federal categories of juvenile crime, new or enhanced federal
penalties affecting juveniles, or incentives for States to advance new or enhanced
penalties for juveniles.
What You Can Do
Sign on to Act 4 JJ's letter to Senate leaders in support of SB 678: Reauthorization of the JJDPA. Click here to read the letter and sign on.
For More Information
Act 4 Juvenile Justice is a nationwide initiative addressing reauthorization of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. Campaign for Youth Justice is a national campaign dedicated to ending the practice of trying, sentencing and incarcerating children under the age of 18 in the adult criminal justice system.
Coalition for Juvenile Justice seeks to improve the circumstances of vulnerable and troubled children, youth and families involved with the courts and to build safe communities.
National Juvenile Justice Network enhances the ability of statewide juvenile justice coalitions to advocate for fair, equitable and developmentally appropriate adjudication and treatment for all youth and families involved in the juvenile justice system.
The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention is under the U.S. Department of Justice.
|